Login with Hive Keychain
Enter your Hive username to sign in securely.
Welcome to HiveComb
HiveComb runs on Hive — an open, decentralized blockchain where your posts, votes, and communities belong to you, not a company. To get started, follow these steps:
Create a Hive account
Set up your free account — it only takes a minute.
Install Hive Keychain
A browser extension that securely signs your transactions — your keys never leave your device.
Refresh & log in
Once Keychain is installed, refresh this page and click Login again.
Need help? Join our Discord and we'll help you get set up.
No account? Create one
Having trouble creating your account? Come to our Discord and we'll get you set up.
No posts found
Try adjusting your filters or wait for the worker to classify more posts.
No posts found
Try adjusting your filters or wait for the worker to classify more posts.
No posts found
Try adjusting your filters or wait for the worker to classify more posts.
Welcome to HiveComb!
Choose your default filters to see the content you care about most.
Languages
Categories
Sentiment
Beginnings matter
A lot of people, especially Bitcoiners, like to praise bitcoin's launch as truly fair.
This post isn't about Bitcoin, but I wanted to bring that part up as it is kind of related to the post yesterday about Zing, hopefully you aren't too tired yet of me posting about it.
Satoshi had emailed some people about the launch and some joined in using their computers, mainly CPU's to mine it. 50 Bitcoin every 10 minutes would go out randomly to people based on how many CPU's they had working on it.
I think the reason they call this truly fair is because so few thought it would go anywhere, so there weren't people renting servers to mine it (maybe some who easily got obsessed with seeing number go up) like they would these days and like we saw when coins like Ethereum launched or even Steem Hive. It also had a very long time of being "worthless", cue 2 bitcoin pizzas for 10k btc, etc.
One could argue Hive is close to those levels as well, allowing for a very cheap entry price to anyone interested in governing or curating or building a presence here and believes it has a future. I don't think I need to write much about what the effects of having a stake on hive means for how well you do in terms of attention and rewards, one easy look at @hurtlocker would tell you that it's a good way to gain attention and a following because people value you more if you have stake.
One could argue that Zing is kind of tied to Hive due to rewards for delegations and its price, so even though it doesn't have the governance aspect of Hive it may offer a good entry point for long term investors if they believe in it, similar to Hive. Needless to say though, not too many do currently or else the price wouldn't be this low (not counting overinflation and its effects on price we may have caused in the past couple years due to the DHF, HBD APR, etc)
Okay, so why am I bringing this up?
This blogpost caught my attention today, basically Unity itself is launching an AI tech stack to make creating games even easier for people than it has been before, and I'm sure this is only the beginning.
This means that costs are going to go way down for creating games and maintaining them, the barrier to entry so to speak won't always require that prior investment and full team of devs to make your ideas become reality.
What does this mean for Zing?
Well, it's not bad news. Yes, we have spent quite a bit on unity gamedev so far but our plans/goals were never to stop at one game.
This means that this will allow us to continue to generate games of all kinds we believe people will like and connect them to the Zing universe as well as the social aspect to the Hive blockchain.
Eventually you will see indie studios pop up left and right, but as most web2 and web3 projects currently, I don't see many of them giving up the rights to equity/ownership the way we've gone about it. Where anyone/everyone can participate in the success of the token and it was fairly launched.
This is quite important and I'm glad I decided to go this route.
For most other projects you have to buy shares or token with unknown distribution, you have to endure founders/creators having most of the equity and using it to evade taxes or take out loans against it or sell over time, etc, while you spend thousands of $ to own a tiny portion of it and hope the markets swing your way.
Why is Zing different exactly?
Well, Zing will utilize its token to be used in all its games. You may think of it like a burn mechanic in most games and diverse other functions. If you want your healers leveled up all the way in the professions, there's a cost attached to it in terms of Zing burn. If you want to capture creatures, every captured creature has a base zing cost attached to it because cards, capture ammo, mana, etc, all require some zing to be burned along the way. If and when we have launched more games, there may be games competing against each other in who's burning more zing vs who's earning more zing.
We as the team/studio are also not interested in hoarding any and all revenues we may receive over time from the games. Other than having safety nets for tougher times, maintenance costs and money set aside for further development (which with AI may become cheaper and cheaper), we may use the rest of funds we don't need to simply burn Zing from the supply. A sort of buyback program where it's fiat vs zing, or any crypto vs zing really.
Think about merch, any profits generated could technically burn zing. Think of ads/sponsorships/etc, any additional profits generated could be used to simply burn Zing.
If the team doesn't need the extra money, it'll go towards burning Zing. We don't wanna pay more taxes than necessary, so why not simply spend those profits to make the token that powers all our games/franchise stronger and more scarce?
Point being, other "companies" with their teams and CEO's are most of the time going to look at getting their bonuses or making sure their shareholders are happy by giving them as much profit as possible. CEO salaries have shot through the roof in recent years and companies are in many cases literally killing games in exchange of pure greed. While players and fans never see a dime of it and are mainly seen as cashcows. This is something we aim to change, even though it may be a naive thing to say at this point in time, I don't think there's going to be many others who can compete with that philosophy because they're not going to want to.
Ask yourself this, where would facebook shares be priced at today if Mark Zuckerberg got a regular salary and all the billions of $ his shares are worth would've instead bought up those shares and burnt them?
I don't have an answer to it, but it excites me to see what could be done if we do things differently. Naturally, we'd also be very grateful to Hive and if our presence and accomplishments themselves aren't beneficial enough for the ecosystem, we'd make sure we burn some of it along the way too.
Now don't get me wrong, we're still in the very very early stages and struggling, and I'm not saying if things go extremely well it means that I personally wouldn't make any money off of it or keep it modest, since I do have a large stake in Zing, but I've bought and earned that stake at the cost of something else, Hive/HBD/other crypto. It's not just been given to me cause I've spent a lot of time working on it and had a cool idea and made it work. There's others with similar sized stake as myself currently and they've also had to forfeit hive rewards to get it. Similarly there's also smaller staked users and in the future anyone/everyone who plays the game or buys some merch or participates in some ways can become a shareholder in the project, which is very different from the current franchises we know who are giants in the space and have been growing with fans and players being one of the main products rather than partners.
Report Misclassification
Why is this post incorrectly classified?
Comments
15 commentsAlthough we have been around for a lot longer than some chains, and crypto in general is kind of old now, I still think we are just at the beginning of what is yet to be. There is a lot of room left to run and I look forward to Holozing being part of that. Also a good time to keep growing my own account.
I don't know where ai will lead, maybe one day we will just have a "one box" thing and we just prompt the game and it creates it, everyone playing a different game... For now it sure will help smooth the development
It would be amazing to have a whole set of games resolving around zing, but one step at a time... Anyways I've never seen anyone work for free so take some profits after all the hours of work wouldn't be a sin
I am mostly of the opinion that we are early with HIVE. Crypto just moves really fast so that is a weird part of HIVE because to me HIVE is an longterm project.
HIVE is not a normal crypto because ALL stakeholders (from small to big) basically function as activist investors. When you have HP, you have influence over the chain. People who do work on HIVE tend to be more receptive to feedback based on your stake weight. You cannot brute force change the chain, but you can have influence; I find this concept very interesting.
One thing I hear a lot is, people only follow me more or listen to me more now because of my stake weight. Well duh! 🤣 It’s a STAKE WEIGHTED chain for crying out loud.
I think too many people treat HIVE like it’s just another alt coin that you can rotate in and out of. That’s really not how it works. If you look at the white paper for HIVE, it is clear HIVE is positioned as a longterm project.
On HIVE we have many different interest groups with different agendas. People are naturally disjointed. HIVE is global so the “HIVE Community” will never be monolithic. We will always disagreements and have a hard time finding consensus. I think that’s ok but it can be frustrating.
In terms of ZING, I think longterm you will be happy you approached your project the way you did.
It’s easy to get depressed when markets are down and it’s easy to get euphoric when markets are up. I try to avoid both these thought processes while staying focused on the big idea of why I made the investment I did in the first place.
Yeah, stake helps there too. Like there's many who don't vote for my witness because we don't offer a higher HBD apr for instance, or because it got lowered eventually to 15% from 20%, but those who care more about HBD don't have that much stake, so naturally they're not going to move the needle much in that regard.
And similarly many who don't support certain people based on previous actions, words, rumors, misunderstandings, disagreements, etc. It's like a free for all. You can't please everyone but it's good that it is that way and that it can work this way.
That’s the part many miss. Hive isn’t a trade, it’s a system. Stake isn’t just capital here, it’s responsibility and signal. Influence emerging from HP isn’t a flaw, it’s the governance model working as designed.
I’ve always viewed Hive as early because it moves slow by crypto standards. That slowness filters out tourists and forces builders to think in years, not rotations. ZING feels aligned with that philosophy. Quiet construction beats loud speculation every time.
I think it really just depends what you mean by Trade. HIVE is both an investment and a system.
I try to be really careful referring to HIVE as a “responsibility” because it still should be fun (in a positive way) IMO.
I think people have the responsibly to mange their own stake as they wish but I do not think having HP makes a user responsible to the whole chain.
HIVE is too complicated to expect people to be responsible for literally everything here.
AI development is going faster and faster and it is not just Unity. I was recently on a call with Microsoft AI people and they told us that over 90% of the code for the latest XBox release was not written by humans...
Heck, forget about Microsoft, in our backwards IT shop we just started looking at AI less than six months ago and now we project that in six months there will be no one in our team writing code... That is over 40 devs right now...
The tools are also evolving at a breakneck speed, what you used in mid 2025 for AI development is completely out of date today...
Important information about bitcoin.
Interesting, you guys have a website for more Infos and Docs?
Nice perspective on fair launches and how early distribution shapes everything. I like the idea of Zing being tied to real in game utility and burns projects with actual sinks tend to build stronger communities over time. From my experience on Hive, tokens with clear use cases and transparent philosophy usually attract more long term believers than hype alone. Curious to see how multiple games in the Zing universe will grow that ecosystem 👍
Such an interesting comparison with Bitcoin’s launch! I didn't know that at the beginning it was as "simple" as using your CPU and seeing what happened. I really like that you're aiming for that same transparency for Zing; in a world full of closed pre-sales and VCs, letting anyone participate from the start feels very Web3.
Fun to see how CPU mining felt like a shared experiment back then.
That “fair launch” only worked because attention and expectations were near zero. No capital, no hype, no infrastructure arms race.
That’s the hard part to recreate today. The closest you can get isn’t copying mechanics, but minimizing asymmetries early and letting value discovery stay boring for as long as possible.
Once speculation shows up too fast, fairness is already gone.
I just upvoted im just changing my keys because of tixfox made a post if you used dtube in the pass you should change you keys that hive and steemit so you dont get high jacked so I hope it was a good move changing them on peakd-hive
you could just remove authority from them afaik