HiveComb

The point is that I prove your point? HaHa, that's kind of funny. :D
I felt invited to tell you my view.
Precisely what do you mean? That my and your knowledge of the unpalatable principles of economics combined with medicine will save us from a majority of superstitious beliefs?

How much do you have to do in practice with people who have undergone the impressive medical-technical possibilities and were independent ever after?

The problem is that it is always those who have to have the medical inventions tried out on them who have no way of resisting: The old, children and the poor. It seems to me that it is not without reason that you attach importance to being educated and wealthy, because there is an inherent awareness that there is a nasty side to it. From that point of view, I don't see any naivety in it.

Countless prepare the way to maintain a theoretical admiration of human knowledge that likes to admire such. However, if you yourself believe that medicine is at an unimagined level of knowledge, then yes, it is not without a certain naivety.

The privilege of healthy people who have not yet undergone continuous medical treatment is to feel invincible and strong for as long as it takes them to be strong. However, those who begin to take precautionary measures to protect themselves against illness simply because the suggestion is promoted that prevention will save them from the fate of becoming ill, overestimate human understanding and knowledge because they ultimately believe they will find answers that reveal the key to life.

In fact, I don't believe that people believe that. But they feel that they are being forced to believe such things and that they basically seem to have no choice.

What is happening in the world at the moment reminds me of myths where a fearful king first tries the shaman's medicine on his subjects to see if they don't drop dead. And even if they don't exactly die, but the medicine weakens them and causes distressful discomfort, this king will be careful not to drink such potion. For he is not concerned with the health of his subjects, but with their numbers, their usefulness and their obedience. To this end, he makes use of the shaman, today's scientist, to impress the crowds who gaze in awe at the holy grail of his art.

I do not deny, however, that impressive medicine seems to exist, though I must say that I have never personally encountered it or that it has not always had its price. What I have experienced is that severe physical pain cannot be relieved by any pharmaceutical product, but requires a humanly devoted body and mind therapy to alleviate pain and eventually be pain-free. Exceptions prove the rule, as you won't find devotion anywhere in modern medicine, just devices, pills, diagnostics and so on. Where there is such a thing as devotion, you have a groundbreaking medical icon.

Coming back to your initial statement that "we have a much greater understanding of life than ever before" I like to throw in that this understanding - at least on the philosophical side - was already there thousands of years ago.